Beyond the Gap: Knowledge Mobilisation and the Journal as a Site of Change
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59210/q9hc3215Downloads
References
1. Balas, E.A., and Boren, S.A. (2000). Managing Clinical Knowledge for Health Care Improvement. Yearbook of medical informatics., 65.
2. Braithwaite, J., Glasziou, P., and Westbrook, J. (2020). The three numbers you need to know about healthcare: the 60-30-10 Challenge. BMC Med. 18, 102. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01563-4.
3. Grimshaw, J.M., Eccles, M.P., Lavis, J.N., Hill, S.J., and Squires, J.E. (2012). Knowledge translation of research findings. Implement. Sci. 7, 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-50.
4. Wagner, A., Polak, P., and Świątkiewicz-Mośny, M. (2019). Who defines–who decides? Theorising the epistemic communities, communities of practice and interest groups in the healthcare field: a discursive approach. Soc. Theory Heal. 17, 192–212. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-018-0073-6.
5. Ward, V. (2017). Why, whose, what and how? A framework for knowledge mobilisers. Évid. Polic. 13, 477–497. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426416x14634763278725.
6. Best, A., and Holmes, B. (2010). Systems thinking, knowledge and action: towards better models and methods. Évid. Polic.: A J. Res., Debate Pr. 6, 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426410x502284.
7. Haynes, A., Rychetnik, L., Finegood, D., Irving, M., Freebairn, L., and Hawe, P. (2020). Applying systems thinking to knowledge mobilisation in public health. Heal. Res. Polic. Syst. 18, 134. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00600-1.
8. Ferlie, E., Crilly, T., Jashapara, A., and Peckham, A. (2012). Knowledge mobilisation in healthcare: A critical review of health sector and generic management literature. Soc. Sci. Med. 74, 1297–1304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.042.
9. Zhou, S., Lebrecht, A., Pithayarungsarit, P., and Monke, C. (2025). The Gatekeepers of Academia: Investigating Bias in Journal Publication Across Topics, Author Backgrounds, and Institutions. Learn. Publ. 38. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.2022.
10. Larivière, V., Haustein, S., and Mongeon, P. (2015). The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era. PLoS ONE 10, e0127502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502.
11. Durrant, H., Havers, R., Downe, J., and Martin, S. (2024). Improving evidence use: a systematic scoping review of local models of knowledge mobilisation. Évid. Polic. 20, 370–392. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426421x16905563871215.
12. Jacobs, C., Anderson, M., Chrysostomou, P., Kadri, K., Leteurtre, C., Jakubiec, P., and Scott, W. (2026). Patients’ perceptions of a multidisciplinary pain management programme in relation to trauma-informed practice principles: a narrative-based qualitative service evaluation. Pain Rehabilitation 56. https://doi.org/10.59210/2wwxdk62.
13. Bryant, S.L. (2025). Actioning actionable knowledge: What do we mean by knowledge mobilisation? Heal. Inf. Libr. J. 42, 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.70004.
14. Davies, H.T., Powell, A.E., and Nutley, S.M. (2015). Mobilising knowledge to improve UK health care: learning from other countries and other sectors - a multimethod mapping study. Heal. Serv. Deliv. Res. 3, 1–190. https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr03270.
15. MacSween, A., Newsome, R., White, L., Dickson, A., Greenwood, J., Ferguson, D., Santos, R., Ryan, C., and Martin, D. (2026). Delivery of the Comprehensive Multi-Disciplinary Combined Physical and Psychological Programme of the National Low Back and Radicular Pain Pathway in England and Wales: where do we stand? Pain Rehabilitation 56. https://doi.org/10.59210/wmrkmd45.
16. Jones, N. (2026). Where There is Pain, There is Always a Person. Pain Rehabilitation 56. https://doi.org/10.59210/xdq6sq70.
17. Nutley, S.M., Walter, I., and Davies, H.T.O. (2007). Using evidence. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9qgwt1.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Chris Seenan, Jackie Walumbe, Niki Jones (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright © [Authors]. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.