Ten Footsteps 2021. An Online course to support self-management of pain

Authors

  • Chris Penlington Author
  • Jenny Ashmore Lived experience and Sport Coach specialising in Injury Rehab @AthleteInjured jenny@zaremba.com Author
  • Mark Agathangelou CamPain (Camden Patient-Led Pain Support Group) Author
  • Rosie Cruickshank INPUT Pain Management Programme, St Thomas; Hospital, London, SE1 7EH Author
  • Frances Cole Live Well with Pain Clinical Lead, GOTT project Clinical Lead (Durham University) info@livewellwithpain.co.uk. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59210/rkbkzr91

Keywords:

Self-management, digital delivery, co-production, pain management

Abstract

Objective
To describe an online self-management course that was piloted as part of Footsteps 2021, an online festival provided on a voluntary basis by a team of health care professionals and experts by experience with the intention of supporting people to live well with pain.
Design A feasibility study to assess who would engage with the course and potential areas of benefit. The Ten Footsteps Course mirrors a multidisciplinary pain management programme and was offered to anybody who identified that they would find it helpful to attend the sessions.
Results
A pre-course survey indicated that people who signed up were familiar with the idea of self-management and were largely in alignment with its ethos. Scores completed on a range of questionnaires were in alignment with those reported from formal pain management services. Thirty-two people completed the pre-course questionnaire. Only nine people completed a follow-up questionnaire at the end of the course. At the end of the course average reported levels of self-efficacy were higher and catastrophizing were lower compared to at the beginning while pain intensity and overall wellbeing did not differ at the two timepoints.
Conclusions
Pain self-management support co-produced and delivered in an open access format is of interest to people living with pain and some appear to benefit. There is a need to explore how this intervention can be made more accessible, including the use of different formats of delivery.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Guidelines for Pain Management Programmes for adults: an evidence-based review prepared on behalf of the British Pain Society (2013).

2. Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Revicki D, Harding G, Burke LB, Cella D et al. Identifying important outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: an IMMPACT survey of people with pain. Pain 2008; 137:276-85

3. Topp CW, Østergaard SD,Søndergaard, Bech P. The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 2015; 84:167–76.

4. Krieger T, Zimmermann J, Huffziger S, Ubl B, Diener C, Kuehner C et al. Measuring depression with a well-being index: Further evidence for the validity of the WHO Well-Being Index (WHO-5) as a measure of the severity of depression. Journal of Affective Disorders 2014;156: 240–44.

5. Darnall BD, Sturgeon JA, Cook KF, Taub CJ, Burns JW, Sullivan M et al. Development and 317 Validation of a Daily Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Journal of Pain 2017; 18: 1139–49.

6. Nicholas MK, Costa DS, Blanchard M, Tardiff H, Asghari A, Blyth FM. Normative data for common pain measures in chronic pain clinic populations: closing a gap for clinicians and researchers. PAIN 320 2019; 160:1156–65.

7. Nicholas MK., McGuire BE, Asghari AA. A 2-Item Short Form of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire: Development and Psychometric Evaluation of PSEQ-2. The Journal of Pain 2015; 323 16:153–63.

8. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 2006; 3:77–101.

9. Wilson IR. Management of chronic pain through pain management programmes. British Medical Bulletin 2017:1–10 doi:10.1093/bmb/ldx032.

10. McCracken LM, MacKichan F, Eccleston C. Contextual cognitive-behavioural therapy for severely disabled chronic pain sufferers: effectiveness and clinically significant change. European Journal of Pain 2007;11: 314–22.

11. Williams D, Booth G, Cohen H, Gilbert A, Lucas A, Mitchell C et al. Rapid design and implementation of a virtual pain management programme due to COVID-19: a quality improvement initiative. British Journal of Pain 2021:20494637211039252doi:10.1177/20494637211039252.

12. Solem IK, Varsi C. Eide H, Krisjiansdottir OB, Mirkovic J, B r sund E, Haaland- verby M et al. Patients’ needs and requirements for eHealth pain management interventions: Qualitative study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019 21;4: e13205

13. Walumbe J, Belton J, Denneny D. Pain management programmes via video conferencing: a rapid review. Scandinavian Journal of Pain 2021 21;32–40.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ten Footsteps 2021. An Online course to support self-management of pain. (2022). Pain and Rehabilitation, 52(1), 34-41. https://doi.org/10.59210/rkbkzr91

Similar Articles

1-10 of 23

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.